Monday, March 30, 2009



So, artwork analysis, I chose Murakami's peice titled "Time":


What I first took notice of was the eyes, the flower rings in the center the most colorful element and contrasting the skull theme in the rest of the piece. It remind me of a depiction of someone addled by drugs- the skeletal frame resembling the wasting body, the green skulls filling the background like a cloud of poison, while the mind experiences happy release. But the flowers resembling Murakami's other peices, instead of drugs, it seems more like someone gazing at 'cute' media, and having the same effect. The poisonous cloud of green skulls then transformed for me into the crowds of people walking through Tokyo.

The second time I looked at the image, what stood out to me was the exaggeration of the nostrils, and the warping of proportions with this skeletal figure- there is no neck, the head is huge, and the length of the spine between the base of the skull and the top of the hips seen at the bottom of the image is impossibly short. The skeleton is deformed like some child-like 'chibi'. Then there's the white skeletal figure upside down off the large one's head- why is white? But skeletons are usually white, so is it only to make us look at the fact that the large on is black? Are we actually looking at the skeleton's shadow, something hidden behind 'reality'? The position of the skeletal figures, ones smaller, one larger, almsot looks like the hand of a clock- or, due to the contrasting colors and position, the dial of a compass. It also remembers a reflection in a body of water immediatly beneath the object being reflected. And indeed, the way the shape wavers almost looks like ripples in water, reflections in some sort of dream- but perhaps this references the title of the piece, "Time", and we are viewing the skeleton's ripples in time. Time and a skeletal figure usually equate to death, but those flower rings remaining present in the eyes seem like life- unless they are some dream that carries on after death.

Of course, after analyzing the piece alone, I had to look at its partner, Bokan:

Such a different expression with the cloud of pink skulls instead of green- and yet the same slightly warped, sickly feeling from the shapes and content. I wondered if perhaps this is meant to be the sight from the other side- this is what "Time" looks look through the eyes of the figure with the flower rings for sight. I decided to look at the title for help, to see what different focus this piece might have than "Time", and looked at the series "Time Bokan" from 1975, which we viewed the opening of in class. While the first piece and its title work as a stand alone, the "Bokan" title makes no sense without the combination. In the "Time Bokan" series, Time Bokan refers to the name of a time machine that looks like an insect. Regardless of whether the title of these art pieces are referencing the series as a whole or the particular time machine from that series, the connection is still puzzling. The "Time Bokan" series held very two dimensional representations of good versus evil, had a simple, repetitive plot, and the "Yattaman" spinoff series was more popular. Perhaps the "Time Bokan" series embodies the sort of media I'd imagined was being watched an absorbed in my analysis of the first piece, with the flower-rings in the eyes. The pink skulls in the background, now almost seeming floral, are smaller, making them seem more distant from and perspective, perhaps implying that this figure is farther removed from the crowd of the world around him. The colors are more similar in hue as well, blending together more seemlessly.



Gala opening for TAKASHI MURAKAMI’s retrospective © Murakami” at MoCA, in LA.
This is interesting because we can't really be sure if the outfits worn by these girls were designed by Mrakami or someone else- just that they were the feminine decor at this Gala he had in Los Angales with Kayne West. Hopefully intended to disturb, the make up is done in a fashion that makes these real women's facial features resemble that of anime girls- white around the eyes to make them larger, with giant black outlines and lashes. edges of the lips paled out to appear smaller, and and cute rounded lipstick to resemble constantly puckered or pursed tiny mouths. The girls themselves don't seem to be chosen to appear identical, but most are caucasion. They seemed dressed to mimic Murakami's "Miss ko2", obviously sexualized and infantialized simultaneously. The facial features are disturbingly warped, despite the aesthetic appeal such stylization can give in animation. The women appear too false in a way that becomes creepy rather than attractive, perhaps too obvious that they aren't meant to represent actual female people, but something impossible.

There's also the obvious juxtaposition of such a glamorous 'maid' outfit, and idea that is meant to represent someone in a position of servitude associated with cleaning. Here, the apron and the rest of classic image is clearly entirely removed from its origin even more so than animated figures, with expensive satin and sequins- a "maid" here is only a woman in "gaze at me" uniform.

3 comments:

  1. It seems to me that these cute colors and pictures and the very feminine doll like women represents the infantilization of the infitile pictures.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hence the infantilization of the infantilization of the infantilized pictures of infantilized subjects. :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. i actually really like this piece of art by murakami, (i mean the skull thing). but i don't know why exactly cuz i know that this is a commentary on the atomic bomb. once realizing that this picture is about the bomb, i can grasp the serious nature of this painting and become very sad about the subject matter. So I think on some levels this image is using cute to make the image of the bomb even stronger. The bomb itself is a picture of a skeleton. I think that somehow makes the image stronger, as in it makes a bigger impact. And the cute makes you think again about the image and makes you realize the seriousness of it, and therefore has a bigger impact that way.

    I'm repeating myself so I'm just going to stop.

    ReplyDelete